Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Do not put up with sites that disrespect you with NOISE-MAKING, AUTO-PLAYING SHIT.

Nobody should give sites a free pass when they blast you with noise upon arrival. How spineless do you have to be to argue that it's OK for some assholes to wake your companion, disturb your coworkers, or otherwise disrupt your space with unauthorized noise?

And yet that's what sniveling apologists do in forum after forum.  But let's start with the perpetrators.

Like ABC News.  These jagoffs continue to blast readers with auto-playing shit, despite being told over and over not to do so.  What do these infants do after they're reprimanded for their bad behavior?  BAN the people who have the gall to stand up for themselves:

Fortune magazine is another prime offender.  They're such spineless twats that they've gotten rid of their comment sections altogether.  Complain directly to their staff, and they don't have the guts to respond.  Ever.  Tell them off here.

Here's a list of offensive Web sites that call you stupid to your face while bombarding you and everyone around you with their unauthorized shit:


I don't have time to catalog all of these assholes right now, so please submit any that you find, in the comments.

Google also deserves blame.  These hypocrites threatened a couple of years ago to "punish" sites that aren't "mobile-friendly;" and yet Google discriminates against mobile users by disabling zooming on the mobile versions of its own pages.

So why doesn't Google punish sites that abuse readers by blasting them with noise?  Google is supposedly taking the step of disabling this crap in Chrome, but why mask the behavior instead of addressing it directly?  Abusing your readers should cost you dearly, and yet Google shows its cowardice by failing to to take a stand against this abuse.

Friday, March 24, 2017

E-mail addresses as user IDs: stupid policy

Once again, Apple is facing a "hacking" fiasco that may have resulted from its own amateurish user-ID policy.

It's not that Apple was hacked; the problem is that millions of E-mail-address/password combinations have fallen into the hands of hackers. And those combinations are what Apple now forces you to use as your Apple ID, instead of letting you create a proper user ID. That is an ignorant policy.

Your E-mail address is on spammers' lists.  When you cross-reference these lists with lists of common passwords, you get a boatload of cracked accounts. And when forced to set up a log-in ID that is an E-mail address, what percentage of the public thinks they have to use (or simply decide to use) the same password that they use for their E-mail account?  I'm guessing at least a quarter.  So now these sites put every user's personal E-mail account at risk, regardless of where it is.   That's why this policy is a monumental security blunder.

If ANY service you use suffers a hack or information theft that includes your E-mail address and password, that combination can be used to access other services (like Apple's) that insist on this ignorant user-ID policy. And indeed, Apple confirmed that this is exactly what happened: "The alleged list of email addresses and passwords appears to have been obtained from previously compromised third-party services."

Here's another example of how this policy sets Apple and its customers up for security breaches and stolen data: http://www.zdnet.com/article/severe-ios-bug-allows-icloud-password-theft

While in this case there's a software defect involved, it still demonstrates how a spammer (who of course already knows your E-mail address) only needs to acquire your password; he can auto-populate the "user ID" field with your E-mail address, making it look legit.

You don't see banks forcing you to use an E-mail address.  Nor brokerages.  Nor credit-card companies.  Hell, even the most obscure comment forums let you set up a legitimate user ID.  But not Apple.

Aside from the glaring security problem, there's common sense.  We all have numerous E-mail addresses by now, and many people's addresses change over time. Which one did I use to sign up for this or that Web site months or years ago?  And when an address goes defunct, people think they need to set up a new ID.  Apple tells users that their Apple ID must be a functioning E-mail address; now they have a boatload of customers with multiple Apple IDs each, preventing them from managing their iTunes/App Store purchases or downloading updates because Apple refuses to consolidate the accounts that its own ignorant policy created.

Of course, Apple's not the only tech company making itself look like amateur hour online.  Amazon has also "taken steps" in response to this attack, but has failed to fix the glaring user-ID problem.  A while back, LinkedIn was caught uploading people's calendar appointments from their mobile devices, and compromising millions of users' passwords.  The first of these was an unauthorized transmission of users' data (in clear text, no less), an offense against users (not to mention Apple's clearly stated policies).  The second was just a failure.

But consider the source: LinkedIn joins Facebook, PayPal, and Apple in their requirement that your user ID be an E-mail address.  The sheer ignorance of this policy undermines any security-related credibility its source might have.

Users shouldn't sit back and shrug this off.  You don't need to roll over for businesses that steal your time and allow others to steal your identity or data.  Use this form to tell Apple that this policy is unacceptable.  Point them to this post or paraphrase it; we need to stop this ignorance.

You can read more about this debacle at The Next Web.  And here's another massive data breach that's going to be much worse because of this asinine policy.

User IDs aren't the only playground for incompetence.  Here comes United Healthcare, screwing up the password field with another offensive policy.

Friday, January 20, 2017

The Chicago Tribune censors anti-Rahm comments.

This is pretty pathetic. The Chicago Tribune will delete comments that criticize Chicago's highly disappointing mayor, Rahm Emanuel.

Take a look at this offense against the 1st amendment:

Yep. Is this Chicago, or China?

The Tribune is supposed to be the paper of the informed populace. But here it proves that it is a tool of corrupt interests.