tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16857716508612746152024-03-13T00:28:07.003-07:00The Office of Scientific IntelligenceOscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-15189083250826172182017-09-26T23:11:00.000-07:002017-09-28T16:03:49.025-07:00Do not put up with sites that disrespect you with NOISE-MAKING, AUTO-PLAYING SHIT.Nobody should give sites a free pass when they blast you with noise upon arrival. How spineless do you have to be to argue that it's OK for some assholes to <b>wake your companion</b>, <b>disturb your coworkers</b>, or otherwise<b> disrupt your space with unauthorized noise</b>?<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
And yet that's what sniveling apologists do in forum after forum. But let's start with the perpetrators.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Like ABC News. These jagoffs continue to <b>blast readers with auto-playing shit</b>, despite being told over and over not to do so. What do these infants do after they're reprimanded for their bad behavior? BAN the people who have the gall to stand up for themselves:</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitN76vCMwqJ6Y9A_e1T-C3T3hE1LpU-0m4TkFF7Ce6C9bW9ekrbQ_cEu1WZK74hfmyoyPsDQ8wpCy-XQBjqjfFni8zMjXUq_jiTkkREKj0Qf7c7osyVX_hFNFSa8Oi9FAHOTUF-AMnhVeM/s1600/banned+by+ABC.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="306" data-original-width="1088" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitN76vCMwqJ6Y9A_e1T-C3T3hE1LpU-0m4TkFF7Ce6C9bW9ekrbQ_cEu1WZK74hfmyoyPsDQ8wpCy-XQBjqjfFni8zMjXUq_jiTkkREKj0Qf7c7osyVX_hFNFSa8Oi9FAHOTUF-AMnhVeM/s640/banned+by+ABC.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Fortune magazine is another prime offender. They're such spineless twats that they've gotten rid of their comment sections altogether. Complain directly to their staff, and they don't have the guts to respond. Ever. Tell them off <a href="https://www.csptcs.com/emailsupport?MSRSMAG=FO" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Here's a list of offensive Web sites that call you stupid to your face while bombarding you and everyone around you with their unauthorized shit:</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
HuffingtonPost.com</div>
<div>
TheHill.com</div>
<div>
ABCNews.com</div>
<div>
CBSNews.com<br />
CNet.com<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_WtoUHHpTI4sddYV6DVkHa6JcRI0fuuYGRrY-W9RXFGqe2ayF8FF14YCIieHjB_CbH7NLBlny21p8mvhB4T4AWijfZuzpcuXCWHoftL-eRO7UTykP5bt5__EMcUQ-TX0KvqwPUyq2cKGW/s1600/CNetBan.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="146" data-original-width="588" height="158" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_WtoUHHpTI4sddYV6DVkHa6JcRI0fuuYGRrY-W9RXFGqe2ayF8FF14YCIieHjB_CbH7NLBlny21p8mvhB4T4AWijfZuzpcuXCWHoftL-eRO7UTykP5bt5__EMcUQ-TX0KvqwPUyq2cKGW/s640/CNetBan.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
I don't have time to catalog all of these assholes right now, so please submit any that you find, in the comments.<br />
<br />
Google also deserves blame. These hypocrites threatened a couple of years ago to "punish" sites that aren't "mobile-friendly;" and yet Google discriminates against mobile users by <b>disabling zooming on the mobile versions of its own pages</b>.<br />
<br />
So why doesn't Google punish sites that abuse readers by blasting them with noise? Google is supposedly taking the step of disabling this crap in Chrome, but why mask the behavior instead of addressing it directly? Abusing your readers should cost you dearly, and yet Google shows its cowardice by failing to to take a stand against this abuse.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-34479805151831759762017-03-24T15:02:00.000-07:002017-03-24T15:37:41.589-07:00E-mail addresses as user IDs: stupid policyOnce again, Apple is facing <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-icloud-ransom-what-you-need-to-know" target="_blank">a "hacking" fiasco</a> that may have resulted from its own amateurish user-ID policy.<br />
<br />
It's not that Apple was hacked; the problem is that millions of E-mail-address/password combinations have fallen into the hands of hackers. And those combinations are what Apple now forces you to use as your Apple ID, instead of letting you create a proper user ID. That is an ignorant policy.<br />
<br />
Your E-mail address is on spammers' lists. When you cross-reference these lists with lists of common passwords, you get a boatload of cracked accounts.
And when forced to set up a log-in ID that is an E-mail address, what percentage of the public thinks they have to use (or simply decide to use) <b>the same password that they use for their E-mail account</b>? I'm guessing at least a quarter. So now these sites put every user's personal E-mail account at risk, regardless of where it is. That's why this policy is a monumental security blunder.<br />
<br />
If ANY service you use suffers a hack or information theft that includes your E-mail address and password, that combination can be used to access other services (like Apple's) that insist on this ignorant user-ID policy. And indeed, Apple confirmed that this is exactly what happened: "The alleged list of email addresses and passwords appears to have been obtained from previously compromised third-party services."<br />
<br />
Here's another example of how this policy sets Apple and its customers up for security breaches and stolen data: <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/severe-ios-bug-allows-icloud-password-theft">http://www.zdnet.com/article/severe-ios-bug-allows-icloud-password-theft</a><br />
<br />
While in this case there's a software defect involved, it still demonstrates how a spammer (who of course already knows your E-mail address) only needs to acquire your password; he can auto-populate the "user ID" field with your E-mail address, making it look legit.<br />
<br />
You don't see banks forcing you to use an E-mail address. Nor brokerages. Nor credit-card companies<b>.</b> Hell, even the most obscure comment forums let you set up a legitimate user ID. But not Apple.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCN-jtevXWDKQxURlbrJQPX81zByC1Dg-wX6hyphenhypheneUwwhSZ3YrWIxsFZlKA4KQzHsb76lGxilcyW2iFWyio5WERYxu6RGtGhez9JqWmMUnKUuxsJl5Afn5tf5Z7ZgWhIc5To01i3E97_TQQA/s1600/Apple.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCN-jtevXWDKQxURlbrJQPX81zByC1Dg-wX6hyphenhypheneUwwhSZ3YrWIxsFZlKA4KQzHsb76lGxilcyW2iFWyio5WERYxu6RGtGhez9JqWmMUnKUuxsJl5Afn5tf5Z7ZgWhIc5To01i3E97_TQQA/s1600/Apple.png" /></a></div>
Aside from the glaring security problem, there's common sense. We all have numerous E-mail addresses by now, and many people's addresses change over time. Which one did I use to sign up for this or that Web site months or years ago? And when an address goes defunct, people think they need to set up a new ID. Apple tells users that their Apple ID must be a functioning E-mail address; now they have a boatload of customers with multiple Apple IDs each, preventing them from managing their iTunes/App Store purchases or downloading updates because Apple refuses to consolidate the accounts that its own ignorant policy created.<br />
<br />
Of course, Apple's not the only tech company making itself look like amateur hour online. Amazon has also "taken steps" in response to this attack, but has failed to fix the glaring user-ID problem. A while back, LinkedIn was caught uploading people's calendar appointments from their mobile devices, and compromising millions of users' passwords. The first of these was an unauthorized transmission of users' data (in clear text, no less), an offense against users (not to mention Apple's clearly stated policies). The second was just a failure.<br />
<br />
But consider the source: LinkedIn joins Facebook, PayPal, and Apple in their requirement that your user ID be an E-mail address. The sheer ignorance of this policy undermines any security-related credibility its source might have.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAQr7x8pNCSBWFLtct7yG9oxWJtJjVZS8ouUxvnQlXigJLrsywBaF3sLijm5F53cchyphenhyphenryTd_hIobmxw0QIaM-XiWOsDDLAV61FHHmeaNYY7XNbslZ1l6Sd4CA9kDXHmnR-JsNp-Dj8brQe/s1600/retards.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiAQr7x8pNCSBWFLtct7yG9oxWJtJjVZS8ouUxvnQlXigJLrsywBaF3sLijm5F53cchyphenhyphenryTd_hIobmxw0QIaM-XiWOsDDLAV61FHHmeaNYY7XNbslZ1l6Sd4CA9kDXHmnR-JsNp-Dj8brQe/s1600/retards.png" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
<br />
Users shouldn't sit back and shrug this off. You don't need to roll over for businesses that steal your time and allow others to steal your identity or data. <b><a href="http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html" target="_blank">Use this form to tell Apple that this policy is unacceptable.</a></b> Point them to this post or paraphrase it; we need to stop this ignorance.<br />
<br />
You can read more about this debacle at <a href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/08/08/apple-puts-24-hour-suspension-on-phone-based-resets-of-apple-id-passwords-in-response-to-recent-hack">The Next Web</a>. And <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/after-mystery-hack-millions-of-logins-for-sale-on-dark-web/" target="_blank">here's another massive data breach</a> that's going to be much worse because of this asinine policy.<br />
<br />
User IDs aren't the only playground for incompetence. <a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2013/09/united-healthcare-audits-your-passwords.html">Here comes United Healthcare, screwing up the password field with another offensive policy.</a>Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com16tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-1587781189116356232017-01-20T20:14:00.000-08:002017-01-20T20:15:26.981-08:00The Chicago Tribune censors anti-Rahm comments.This is pretty pathetic. The Chicago Tribune will delete comments that criticize Chicago's highly disappointing mayor, Rahm Emanuel.<br />
<br />
Take a look at this offense against the 1st amendment:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRxHvllsFjS2Ph6yzshtcFqtzV9D9VZycGSyKltv_TaOYzw_NhwIwuRzxY4gSK0kT_I_A4m6jyBt57cG8Ab1Fk5lxwUsCDyY1mjh1kf2AY5zlylmm4p5oZJzxgTcnSKbTYh37Cwd1tR7Jr/s1600/TribuneCensorship.tiff" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="347" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRxHvllsFjS2Ph6yzshtcFqtzV9D9VZycGSyKltv_TaOYzw_NhwIwuRzxY4gSK0kT_I_A4m6jyBt57cG8Ab1Fk5lxwUsCDyY1mjh1kf2AY5zlylmm4p5oZJzxgTcnSKbTYh37Cwd1tR7Jr/s640/TribuneCensorship.tiff" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Yep. Is this Chicago, or China?<br />
<br />
The Tribune is supposed to be the paper of the informed populace. But here it proves that it is a tool of corrupt interests.Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-31793267421357521272016-09-27T19:13:00.002-07:002016-09-27T19:13:42.423-07:00Apple's war on usefulness and its own customersAfter wading into the incompetent mess that was the cell-phone market before the iPhone and improving it, Apple has done a 180 and is now driving it backward.<br />
<br />
Apple continually degrades its products, waging a war on usefulness and its own customers. The removal of the headphone jack is the latest and most offensive insult to customers and consumers in general. Apple and Jony Ive continue to call the public stupid, by releasing ever-more-crippled and anti-customer designs. And their only excuse is the long-tired and unasked-for marketing gimmick, "thinner."<br />
<br />
The majority of customers have declared that Apple's iPhone design is a failure. How do we know this? They bury the "thin, elegant" iPhone in a tacky, bulky case. And with Jony Ive's insistence that you don't need a battery in your phone, those cases are even bulkier and tackier because they must also serve as the battery. Even Apple was compelled to release an embarrassing humpbacked condom for its flagship product.<br />
<br />
Another testament to Apple's design failure is the legions of people carrying a power brick and wad of wire around with their "thin, elegant" iPhone, begging bartenders to plug them in or crawling under tables at restaurants to do so themselves. Ask anyone in the industry: Service establishments are having to lay down employee rules and policies about this behavior, a behavior that could easily be made nonexistent by simply putting a proper battery in the phone.<br />
<br />
And then there are the functional and UI defects. The most embarrassing of which has existed since day one of the first iPhone, and has inexplicably not been fixed (an extremely simple fix at that): no audible notifications of missed calls. Seriously, on A PHONE. <a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2012/06/will-apple-ever-fix-iphones-biggest.html" target="_blank">There's simply no excuse for this</a>.<br />
<br />
How about another software blunder, which causes people to miss flights and appointments and who knows what else? Yes, it's Apple's ridiculously incompetent calendar, which (without your permission) changes the times of appointments when you travel. <a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2016/03/apples-idiotic-time-zone-support-sets.html" target="_blank">And there's no way to prevent this behavior</a>.<br />
<br />
Then there's the UI, which is increasingly based on Easter eggs and secret "gestures." This is lazy, incompetent design. After setting the standard for phone UI and just nailing it with the best mobile browser right out of the gate, Apple is going backward fast. Now we have controls disguised as plain text. We have a music player where most of the toolbar controls are useless junk, and selecting a song doesn't bring up its album art and metadata anymore. We have an address book that once let you select a group (say, "Doctors") and go into it with one tap, but now inexplicably makes you go to the groups list, find and deselect the group you <i>were</i> showing, then find and select the one you want to see, and then dismiss the list. WTF? Who works like that?<br />
<br />
The sad part is that Apple hasn't reached the bottom. They continue to call you stupid more aggressively and in more ways, making your investment in the Apple ecosystem less and less useful... and yet people still serve as tools and apologists for this behavior.Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-88343451607482260482016-08-26T22:59:00.003-07:002017-01-24T17:21:40.267-08:00Why consumers and shareholders should punish Apple for removing the headphone jack.Apple is waging a war against usefulness. Under design chief Jony Ive's regime, Apple's hardware has suffered continual regression that makes it less useful with every iteration.<br />
<br />
I'm not talking about power users, either; I'm talking about the general public. And right now I'm talking about the iPhone.<br />
<br />
You see it every day: People squatting in the corner of a coffee shop with their iPhone plugged into an outlet... and that's before lunch, when no battery should be dead. People carrying power bricks and wads of wire around, begging the bartender to plug their iPhones in. Or crawling under tables to do so themselves. This is what Jony Ive says you want. And it's pathetic.<br />
<br />
Apple's excuse is its continued, baffling, and unasked-for mania to make things "thinner." As internal components shrink, Apple doesn't use the space for battery. It just makes the phone "thinner" (but not really, because the camera lens sticks out). Yet Apple wants us to use MORE battery power; for Bluetooth to communicate with the Watch, or stream music over the cellular radio, or use GPS-based apps and games. And the thinner phone is less ergonomic and more prone to being dropped and broken.<br />
<br />
But we already knew that the majority Apple's customers have condemned the iPhone's design as a failure. How do we know? By simply observing that the vast majority of them have buried the "thin, elegant" iPhone in a bulky, tacky case. Because they believe it can't withstand being used for its primary purpose, and they simply can't reliably grasp it. And a growing number of those cases are even bulkier and tackier, because they must also serve as the phone's battery.<br />
<br />
Even Apple felt compelled to introduce an embarrassing battery case for its so-called mobile phone.<br />
<br />
But that's not the worse aspect of all of this. Now Apple has removed the audio output from its primary music players. Let's consider the stupidity of this move, which should anger every user and shareholder. Starting with a quote from MarketWatch (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/frank-ocean-cranks-up-the-apple-vs-spotify-beef-2016-08-26):<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"With sales of iPhones stagnating, Chief Executive <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-is-about-to-get-a-lot-more-of-your-money-2016-04-04" target="_blank">Tim Cook has focused on software and services as a growth engine for the world’s most valuable company</a>"</b></blockquote>
<br />
Apple's aggressive promotion and spending on Apple Music prove that it considers music to be a major part of that "growth engine." So why on earth would Apple impede the public's consumption of that service by deleting the music output from its music players? To sell a relatively few clunky headphones?<br />
<br />
That's extremely poor strategy, as the market has reached maturity and people are <a href="http://www.barrons.com/articles/the-suddenly-boring-iphone-1485276225" target="_blank">simply bored with the iPhone</a>.<br />
<br />
Every investor should take Apple to task for this irresponsible and inexcusable step backward. Not only will Apple lose iPhone sales to this (yes, they will), but it undermines Apple's future business by hampering consumption of its services. This kind of gross misstep should also be punished by the stock market; another loss for investors who are already part owners of Apple.<br />
<br />
All the excuses for this blunder are laughable at best. Let's dismantle a few:<br />
<br />
<h4>
<span style="color: #e69138;">
1. You can use an adapter.</span></h4>
<br />
The asinine adapter isn't the answer, because (aside from having to carry yet another piece of crap around everywhere with your "thin, elegant" iPhone) you can't charge the phone while using it. Want to listen to music on that long road trip while navigating? NOPE.<br />
<br />
And good luck replacing that adapter when you lose it on your overseas trip. And if you can, it'll be $30 (or more; we don't know yet).<br />
<br />
<h4>
</h4>
<h4>
<span style="color: #e69138;">
2. The headphone jack is outdated, like floppy disks and physical media.</span></h4>
<br />
This may be the dumbest one. Your <b>ears are analog</b>, and that's not going to change. To hear music, it must at some point be converted from digital data into an analog waveform by a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter. That waveform is used to electrically move a piece of material that moves air against your eardrum. If the music player has a speaker (like every phone), it <b>must</b> contain a D/A converter. So that's not going away; Apple's just denying you the connection to it.<br />
<br />
Now Apple wants everyone else to put redundant D/A converters in <b>every listening appliance</b>. Every headset, earbud, car stereo, home stereo, boombox, hotel-room clock radio, TV, portable amp, PA system. Yeah, this isn't just about headphones. It's about an entire planet's worth of sound reproduction equipment that does and always will have to deliver an analog waveform to your ears.<br />
<br />
So no, this is not comparable to abandoning an obsolete format.<br />
<br />
<h4>
<span style="color: #e69138;">
3. Removing the headphone jack will allow Apple to make the phone thinner.</span></h4>
<br />
This is a crock. The Lightning port is 3mm across. The headphone jack is 3.7mm across. And the iPhone's thickness will be dictated by the protruding camera lens.<br />
<br />
We already covered this excuse above, and nobody is campaigning for thinner iPhones. To continue to push this played-out marketing gimmick embarrasses Apple and lends credence to the claim that they're out of ideas.<br />
<br />
<h4>
<span style="color: #e69138;">
4. Almost everyone uses wireless headphones, proven by the fact that more wireless ones are sold now.</span></h4>
<br />
Lame strawman that only a shut-in would believe. Look around you in the real world. Even at the gym, the vast majority of earphones in use are wired. The sales-figures argument is invalid, because music players and iPhones have <b>come with</b> earbuds, so most people (sadly) will simply put up with them and not buy anything better. It stands to reason that those who <i>do</i> buy additional headphones are likely to buy wireless ones (because they already have wired earbuds, in case I need to spell that out).<br />
<br />
But that doesn't matter anyway: <b>The headphone jack doesn't prevent anyone from using wireless or digital headphones.</b><br />
<br />
In the end there simply is no excuse for removing the headphone jack. There are only lame attempts to explain why we shouldn't care.Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-74641212048739871472016-08-05T12:55:00.001-07:002016-08-05T22:16:24.297-07:00NBC continues to rip off the public and screw Team USA at the Olympics.NBC, a broadcaster granted a portion of our public spectrum to transmit content for profit, is once again denying United States viewers access to coverage of their Olympic athletes online. And its excuses embarrass the network and insult the viewers.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So much wrong here. From <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/watch-live">NBCOlympics.com</a>:</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #e06666;">Q: What do I need to watch video on NBCOlympics.com?<br />A: In order to watch any video on NBCOlympics.com, you must install the latest version of Adobe(R) Flash(R) (supports v10 and above). Adobe(R) Flash(R) will provide you with the best NBC Olympics viewing experience including HD quality video, DVR controls and much more.</span><br />
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: 'Fira Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
That's right people: NBC is still using Flash. That's pathetic by itself, but it also screws mobile users. Oh well! Don't worry about moving into this decade anytime soon, NBC.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><br /><br /><span style="color: #e06666;">Q: What is required for access to view "Live Streaming" video content?<br />A: You can access live streams of EVERY NBC Olympics event by authenticating with a cable, </span></span><span style="color: #e06666;">satellite or telco TV subscription through your service provider.</span><br />
<div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: 'Fira Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
Ah yes, the big lie of NBC's proud claim of "streaming every event." Does a bear shit in the woods? Maybe, but if you can't see it, who's to say? Now here's the most insulting part of NBC's fraud:<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #e06666;">Q: Why is authentication being required?<br />A: Authentication supports our ongoing investment in sports programming for all of our platforms and is consistent with industry trends. Digital platforms require significant investment, and authentication allows us to capture the value of that investment, which in turn allows us to continue to provide cable/satellite/telco customers with high-quality sports coverage wherever and whenever they want at no additional cost. </span><br />
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: 'Fira Sans', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
This is absolute bullshit. First off, "consistent with industry trends" means, "other providers are ripping people off, so we're going to try it too."<br />
<br />
Then there's "digital platforms require significant investment." Hey NBC, broadcasting went digital a decade ago. What analog distribution are you doing?<br />
<br />
Finally, and most damning, there's the fact that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/26/business/media/supreme-court-rules-against-aereo-in-broadcasters-challenge.html" target="_blank">NBC sued Aereo</a>, a company that would have expanded NBC's viewership (thus increasing its ratings and the value of its content) by building online infrastructure <b>free of charge to NBC</b>. So NBC is whining about "significant investment" after idiotically attacking a company that was set <b>to do that investment free</b>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2012/08/nbcs-olympic-lie.html">More historic NBC stupidity</a>.</div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-86915561119764784942016-07-20T16:08:00.001-07:002016-07-20T16:09:57.895-07:00Apple calls you stupid by getting rid of the headphone jack.<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
Another day, another apologist pretending that this is "progress."</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
WRONG. Your ears require <b>analog</b> audio waveforms. Those come from headphones or speakers, which move AIR to produce pressure corresponding to those waveforms. There's nothing Apple or anyone else can do at the moment to "progress" beyond that.</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
So by removing the source of sound from its <b>music-centric</b> phones, Apple will idiotically require <b>redundant</b> conversion hardware in EVERY listening device. Not only will every headphone, car stereo, hotel-room clock radio, boom box, and home stereo have to decode whatever crap-ass protocol Apple will use (which will most likely <b>recompress</b> your already-compressed music), it will then have to do the D/A conversion.</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
Or... it could be done by the player device <b>ONCE</b>.</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
Never mind that anyone who cares about sound already has good headphones. And don't even float the turd of, "Well, get an adapter." Yes, that's classic Apple "elegance:" carrying a wad of adapters and wires around, making your "thin, elegant" iPhone into a Christmas tree of crap because of course you'll need some kind of Y adapter to charge it while listening. Oh, and don't forget all this junk when you go on vacation. Want to play tunes in your rental car? WOOPS, just when every car has an auxiliary input... Apple makes it useless.</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
Oh, and never mind that the Lightning port is an embarrassing engineering fiasco that delivers <b>worse</b> quality than the ancient 30-pin port it replaced: <a href="https://panic.com/blog/the-lightning-digital-av-adapter-surprise" rel="nofollow" style="-webkit-transition: all 0.2s ease; background-image: none; border: none; color: #b80000; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none; transition: all 0.2s ease;" target="_blank">https://panic.com/blog/the-lightning-digital-av-adapter-surprise</a></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
And finally, if you're all keen on a junked-up, recompressed, battery-sapping, all-digital pipeline to your headphones... you can have it WITHOUT getting rid of the headphone jack. There is no excuse for removing it, period. The "thinness" argument is not only a lie (LOOK at the thing), but it's stupid anyway because nobody asked for a THINNER phone.</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Proxima-Nova, proxima-nova, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
Grow a nut and demand <b>better</b>, instead of rolling over and showing your flabby white belly to your corporate masters because it's too uncomfortable for you to admit that Apple is calling you stupid... and you're proving them right.</div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-59352378742772918792016-06-08T03:05:00.004-07:002016-06-08T04:06:57.745-07:00The Los Angeles Times: Censoring comments to protect its offensive practices and... state cronies?The L.A. Times implements at least a couple of offensive, anti-reader practices. They launch noise-making ads without user approval, and they inexplicably disable zooming on their mobile site.<br />
<br />
That's bad enough. But then they compound the offense by censoring comments that call them out on it. And there's yet more: On top of that, they censor comments that call the state of California out for its rip-offs as well.<br />
<br />
Look at this bullshit:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7J_7NP5AFJOSOENr9ATEMqDXLS7Dwcmutwqe1cJSM3xSAMTHy5nyHsi11Vb4R4Zgpr7NGdZVAYK9B6Xo8uXThyZj6iFBT8xq5neDaURH1zdXWvRNcjObdKFoIidGel_bFwwmudqVP_Pwc/s1600/LATimesCensors01.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7J_7NP5AFJOSOENr9ATEMqDXLS7Dwcmutwqe1cJSM3xSAMTHy5nyHsi11Vb4R4Zgpr7NGdZVAYK9B6Xo8uXThyZj6iFBT8xq5neDaURH1zdXWvRNcjObdKFoIidGel_bFwwmudqVP_Pwc/s1600/LATimesCensors01.png" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Now what kind of publication is so ashamed of its own work that it bans comments that refer to it? A deliberately deceitful one. There's more:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeqniZVIpo6iwqZ43Zys3Njg3doGcu7LGfZWeovIftWGISiM1y6vIVJ5ulJX8VpTmBg9xAP2_clplqevOsAEk6OW4Aax6u3_0OF6s97-oyaTdUXCtpQDcLzPkYzhCM3PfOOY-xghhBFrNB/s1600/LATimesCensors02.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeqniZVIpo6iwqZ43Zys3Njg3doGcu7LGfZWeovIftWGISiM1y6vIVJ5ulJX8VpTmBg9xAP2_clplqevOsAEk6OW4Aax6u3_0OF6s97-oyaTdUXCtpQDcLzPkYzhCM3PfOOY-xghhBFrNB/s1600/LATimesCensors02.png" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
So this is "journalism" today. It's free, so it's worth nothing. And that's exactly what the L.A. Times delivers and tries to defend. Shoddy work and disgraceful cover-ups, instead of simply <b>fixing the problem</b>.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
I guess it is embarrassing when comments provide more information than the "story" above them. Some publications (honorable ones, that is) would use this as incentive to do better. The L.A. Times simply tries to bury the problem.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Hey L.A. Times: Take a lesson from local cats and bury your shit, instead of your readers.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-66447062208934131692016-03-08T13:38:00.001-08:002016-03-08T13:40:53.680-08:00Apple's idiotic "time-zone support" sets users up to miss flights and everything else.Apple loves to operate in a fantasy world of its own, ignoring reports of glaring defects until they've become embarrassing PR debacles.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
This is because Apple doesn't seem to relate to how real people do real things. For example, how they use a calendar.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
When you book a flight, the airline gives you an itinerary with times on it.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGQWQazVpNBw3yCZ9zTxle9NoNC3eekcQxSwV96urhTYyp1wiMGG8NUtKXZojscyItz-ct-TECO65ouvrmnqRIUkh7FGKOtdSvvUB6GMMc7XP8-tnMLj9frAug_Yw4j_jHuH7BC_41xorH/s1600/itinerary.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGQWQazVpNBw3yCZ9zTxle9NoNC3eekcQxSwV96urhTYyp1wiMGG8NUtKXZojscyItz-ct-TECO65ouvrmnqRIUkh7FGKOtdSvvUB6GMMc7XP8-tnMLj9frAug_Yw4j_jHuH7BC_41xorH/s400/itinerary.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Those times are LOCAL TIMES. Is there anyone on the planet who thinks that United is putting non-local times on its itineraries, as if you're not going to change your watch or something? YES: Someone at Apple thinks that.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Consider the craven stupidity of this "logic:" </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgidcVksx7jg3XJdr710JmU_8rjC_t-idbr6ZjlvfOg0s5YN3AvS7Hea9yKHGqqe9m0WBBOA-etHuG1DXL-ddgYZx1uRazmDMdd7zKny4WTsLTXkw9g7A_IhC6pmwLQvSOZI6l3y0suYtCg/s1600/AppleCalendarBS.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="569" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgidcVksx7jg3XJdr710JmU_8rjC_t-idbr6ZjlvfOg0s5YN3AvS7Hea9yKHGqqe9m0WBBOA-etHuG1DXL-ddgYZx1uRazmDMdd7zKny4WTsLTXkw9g7A_IhC6pmwLQvSOZI6l3y0suYtCg/s640/AppleCalendarBS.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
So neither of these settings ensures that your iPhone will go off at the specified numeric time shown on the phone's screen. In fact, it doesn't appear to do anything. It's incredible: Apple's handheld Unix computer can't do what a $9 alarm clock can.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
And yet Apple gets a free pass on grossly defective designs like this, which aren't just cosmetic annoyances. <b>They cause people to miss important events</b>. Why do you allow it?</div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-1138625140579634962015-11-21T17:33:00.002-08:002017-01-13T03:36:28.531-08:00UnitedHealth Group "opting out" of Affordable Care Act? BULLSHIT.The news is all over mainstream media: United Healthcare will probably bail out of Obamacare.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Let's call this what it is: An outrage to every taxpayer, and intolerable. It also reveals yet more incompetence in the crafting of this so-called healthcare "reform."</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
It's bad enough that insurance companies are allowed to sell half-assed policies under Obamacare, policies that care providers can identify as subsidized; those providers usually don't accept them, even when they accept supposedly identical non-subsidized policies. Care providers should have no knowledge of who's paying for a PPO (for example), and insurance companies should not be allowed to reimburse doctors at different rates simply because of how a client is paying for his insurance. If Blue Shield has determined that $200 is a fair rate for setting a broken arm, then why would that vary because of how the client is paying for it?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The fact that it's ALLOWED TO means that this healthcare law is corrupt and incompetent.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Now we have a company "opting out." <b>THAT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL</b>. It is <b>our</b> country, and these companies do business at our discretion. The health of this nation should NOT be a for-profit enterprise in the first place. But it is, and despite the gravy train we taxpayers trowel out to these scumbags, they're now "opting out" of their responsibility to provide what we pay for?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
NO WAY.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Look up your Congressional representatives <a href="http://whoismyrepresentative.com/" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Write to them. Tell them that we can't stand for companies ripping off our citizens and undermining what little "reform" we've been able to enact. Tell them that insurance companies should not be allowed to "opt out" of our national healthcare plan, and shouldn't be allowed to sell plans that are identifiable as subsidized or reimburse at different rates because they're subsidized.<br />
<br />
Citizens get fined if they "opt out." <b>So why don't insurance companies?</b> They should be fined so heavily that it's more economical to simply deliver what they're supposed to be delivering: insurance to all of us.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The fact is that this "reform" didn't go far enough. We should have abolished for-profit healthcare and detached insurance from people's jobs entirely. This idiotic association cripples our country and renders all talk of "entrepreneurship" or "small business" a sham, an insult, and monumental hypocrisy. We can't quit dead-end jobs and start a business or be an entrepreneur when our insurance is still inexplicably tied to OUR JOBS!</div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-76661873563088084892015-11-06T21:37:00.001-08:002015-11-11T17:26:10.201-08:00Covered California Web site is a defective pile of shit.I don't even know where to begin excoriating this monumental offense to every California taxpayer. From beginning to end, there is absolutely no excuse for the incompetence and defectiveness of this Web site, <b>TWO YEARS IN</b>.<br />
<br />
This year I was denied a health-insurance subsidy. Why? Because <b>I MAKE TOO LITTLE</b>. That's right: I want to pay for health insurance, but the government is <b>TURNING MY MONEY AWAY</b>. Now that should offend every taxpayer in the country.<br />
<br />
But that's not all. I actually want to report <b>more</b> income to "qualify" for a subsidy. But I can't, because the CoveredCA Web site can't do simple math. Look at this pathetic functionality:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi19TwDWJhjYYxrpNvS8x0Hms766s6288jCNMFk2nYzKQl_q6Ir9SyCOMeMs3vCT99kxsb1lXQfPhsAQMmt698a2qAWNLkO14EcJ0UDfjiuzqGM8l3bOJe5B1mRLgELQr9fEYkqwJrCRw0Z/s1600/CoveredCAWrongMath.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="342" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi19TwDWJhjYYxrpNvS8x0Hms766s6288jCNMFk2nYzKQl_q6Ir9SyCOMeMs3vCT99kxsb1lXQfPhsAQMmt698a2qAWNLkO14EcJ0UDfjiuzqGM8l3bOJe5B1mRLgELQr9fEYkqwJrCRw0Z/s640/CoveredCAWrongMath.png" width="640" /></a></div>
What are we to do when we're denied healthcare because a Web site <b>CAN'T DO MULTIPLICATION?</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
Oh, but there's more. You can't even fix this mess because if you change anything, even if it's only your income, you're presented with this baffling (and of course defective) list of alleged changes that you made. Except, of course, that you didn't make any of them except one:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7Vs1bTNP4efh9ljptzQSIQkGJTSmJ8Cf2Vj8JrfpQ92YgDQ9Uv1pAOiI01uSGZdJrYFDgfwRdnmd40r5gx31Guq8KztHZWfvB5-5sVS5g8xF_Xx5iGCsQ576p6vKUmNT4bSQsd3-WlCZE/s1600/CoverCABullshit.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="392" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7Vs1bTNP4efh9ljptzQSIQkGJTSmJ8Cf2Vj8JrfpQ92YgDQ9Uv1pAOiI01uSGZdJrYFDgfwRdnmd40r5gx31Guq8KztHZWfvB5-5sVS5g8xF_Xx5iGCsQ576p6vKUmNT4bSQsd3-WlCZE/s640/CoverCABullshit.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Yes, this will claim that you changed your coverage, even if you didn't. And there's no harmless "reason" option to select. For the other entries, you can just select "other." But not the change of insurance coverage. Every available "reason" is potentially disqualifying.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
And want to get "help" from Covered California? Good luck. The "live chat" button has NEVER worked. Not once since this debacle launched.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFKRvcmrWvV0ID1ibLTnJ_4DGID95-_gTIg5tRHeCftYP1jTWf7vA_cDSGimQ0HfWQW8ShBt54IkqlVd2srOJDR97HUmd4fDRjttOl-NKpvWzYn13VVinAsa51fvVYO3E06mdsnwNsIYgt/s1600/CoveredCAChatBullshit.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="260" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFKRvcmrWvV0ID1ibLTnJ_4DGID95-_gTIg5tRHeCftYP1jTWf7vA_cDSGimQ0HfWQW8ShBt54IkqlVd2srOJDR97HUmd4fDRjttOl-NKpvWzYn13VVinAsa51fvVYO3E06mdsnwNsIYgt/s640/CoveredCAChatBullshit.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
It's unbelievable. Somebody got paid OUR MONEY to create this inexcusably defective pile of shit. And it has sat there, steaming, for two years.</div>
<br />Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-49976458481882471172013-09-29T21:44:00.001-07:002013-09-29T21:45:40.332-07:00iPhone pictures and videos are upside-down. Just another embarrassing bug Apple refuses to fix.We all know that the iPhone and iPad have orientation sensors. They know which way the camera is turned when you take a picture or video.<br />
<br />
Instead of using this information to simply encode the image right-side-up (putting the pixels that belong in the upper-left corner first in the file, and progressing from there), Apple stores the pixels in whatever haphazard orientation the phone is in and sets a metadata flag on the file to record that orientation. It then becomes the job of every other piece of software on the planet to cater to this flag and rotate the image accordingly when displaying it.<br />
<br />
Typical Apple solution. Instead of simply recording the image right-side-up and thereby enabling any JPEG viewer ever written to show it without a problem, Apple implements a hokey hack and expects everybody to rewrite their applications to pander to it.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiN4lwfMQ5If2ifLcn0FMrVdUAm04UhdbDqXfIDEvfLMtwDOOyXR4GS5hPL3sMHO6CdgzzeoutamQp-9IZIj7NRVI_3OzjoWhJfCzJ32KgOBCCQblJX5L1x3HQKo6FVqaCe_QlXBLeLuz8q/s1600/realWorldUsage.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiN4lwfMQ5If2ifLcn0FMrVdUAm04UhdbDqXfIDEvfLMtwDOOyXR4GS5hPL3sMHO6CdgzzeoutamQp-9IZIj7NRVI_3OzjoWhJfCzJ32KgOBCCQblJX5L1x3HQKo6FVqaCe_QlXBLeLuz8q/s640/realWorldUsage.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
According to Apple, this is everybody else's fault.Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-20287132397563440222013-09-03T16:39:00.001-07:002013-09-03T16:39:42.093-07:00United Healthcare audits your passwords for swearsYou'd think that setting up a user-registration page with reasonable validation rules would be pretty easy. But <a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2012/06/forcing-people-to-use-e-mail-address-as.html">as we've seen</a>, there apparently aren't enough sensible people available to do this work.<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
United Healthcare takes the incompetence to a new level by <b>judging the vulgarity level of your password</b>. And the best part is that they keep this policy a secret.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTc3wx3JGgSi3qPN98HQq2p9p_Nq9AfcIVev0WHXTTGWYa55hOm_PF8LcToYASvtBt0SVpyhuL4lEZ7Q8gEjBvN3CnQP3okLV67JhH-iRXDxLTdC7jkppW14zqcUlpBL0B2hJpzRGTDyHl/s1600/UHCPWBullshit.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="466" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTc3wx3JGgSi3qPN98HQq2p9p_Nq9AfcIVev0WHXTTGWYa55hOm_PF8LcToYASvtBt0SVpyhuL4lEZ7Q8gEjBvN3CnQP3okLV67JhH-iRXDxLTdC7jkppW14zqcUlpBL0B2hJpzRGTDyHl/s640/UHCPWBullshit.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So not only does United Healthcare inappropriately examine confidential passwords for their semantic content, but UHC also <b>deliberately wastes customers' time</b> by not telling them why their passwords are rejected time after time, despite following the rules spelled out on the page.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
And they know the policy is causing problems, because if you call their support line and tell them your new password is being rejected, the first question they ask is, "Does it contain curse words?"</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Of course the appropriate question for you to ask in response is, "What business is it of yours?"</div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-73676950797069030452013-08-06T02:45:00.003-07:002022-05-29T15:15:38.515-07:00"Responsive design" doesn't mean what you think it means.For some reason, somebody thought that "responsive" describes a user interface with a flexible layout that fits on screens of varying resolution and aspect ratio. But it doesn't. The word "layout" is missing from the phrase "responsive design." Even "flexible" alone would be far superior to "responsive."<br />
<br />
Responses come after events. The simple presentation of a UI isn't an "event" that hits the UI, because the UI doesn't exist yet; its dimensions and layout have to be determined <b>before</b> it's presented. THEN it's ready to respond.<br />
<br />
A responsive design would be one that responds to user input or other events.<br />
<br />
With so many words available to us, why would we label something with such a meaningless (or worse, incorrect) term?Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-86790207646382259442013-08-06T02:24:00.000-07:002013-08-06T02:59:35.818-07:00Good GUI design is not skeuomorphism.Many of us wanted Apple to reverse its embarrassing slide into amateurish, cartoonish interfaces; the much-derided "skeuomorphism." Unfortunately Apple has also abandoned proper GUI design. Getting rid of tacky, asinine, and incorrect crap like controls disguised as the paint on a blackjack table is good. Getting rid of CONTROLS is stupid, and that is what Apple and Microsoft have done in a great many cases. Disguising controls as static text (or hiding them altogether or relying on secret "gestures") represents total ignorance of what made GUIs "revolutionary" to begin with. If you don't demarcate controls, they might as well not be there. Are users supposed to tap on every letter and glyph on the screen, looking for hidden goodies? Or swipe in every possible direction and every item on every screen? That's sheer stupidity.<br />
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #42474a; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: white;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #42474a; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: white;">"Flat" design suffers from other regressions. If a button is "flat", how do we know what state it's in? If it is rendered as something resembling a real button, it can be "up", depressed, or greyed out. One of its three possible states is clearly and instantly conveyed to the user. But if it's just a colored rectangle, what state is it in?</span><br />
<span style="color: white;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #42474a; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: white;">The question is where all of the decent designers have gone at these companies. Did they just get bored and quit altogether? The regressions at Microsoft and Apple in basic user interfaces just make you wonder how these bad ideas are percolating to the top. There are plenty of things to fix in both companies' products, without this desperate flailing to do something "different." Desperate and defective.</span></div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-7092951931201026622013-07-29T18:26:00.000-07:002015-07-08T18:11:41.113-07:00Capital One: We're too stupid to let you know that we didn't get your payment.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJYhnV_TRh-anb2k8rYm4Q80y-KKcytK468NmrruZfcWsPLw8goaxpiWXlep-Jy-APJHBbU5f690BMq_YhNfYHKrgJGLaLl7gtyLKZVbgVCVo3VGqlITd59OlyuIEfKGjb2EF7C54Zl3HH/s1600/CapitalOneDumbShits.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="353" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJYhnV_TRh-anb2k8rYm4Q80y-KKcytK468NmrruZfcWsPLw8goaxpiWXlep-Jy-APJHBbU5f690BMq_YhNfYHKrgJGLaLl7gtyLKZVbgVCVo3VGqlITd59OlyuIEfKGjb2EF7C54Zl3HH/s640/CapitalOneDumbShits.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
UPDATE: After years of customer complaints, Capital One has <b>finally</b> added a notification if your payment hasn't been received two days after its due date. The bad news is that... <b>it doesn't work</b>. You can set the notification up, but it isn't sent. The crack team of IT professionals over there has supposedly been working on this for months, and still hasn't been able to figure out why all the notifications work except for this one.<br />
<br />
So, STILL: If Capital One doesn't receive your monthly payment, you won't hear anything about it. At some point in the future (it appears to be about two and a half weeks), you'll go to use your card and it'll be declined. The repercussions can range from embarrassing and annoying to disastrous.<br />
<br />
The baffling and inexcusable fact here is that Capital One does not (and <b>will not</b>) send you any notification (not even an E-mail) the day after your payment was due, saying "we didn't get it." The sheer stupidity of this boggles the mind. They've already applied their late fee, so they've ripped you off there. They're already charging you interest on the outstanding balance, so they're making money off of you there. But by simply canceling your card without telling you, <b>they make it impossible for you to use it and make them more money</b>. You end up using another card (if you're lucky enough to have one on hand), and they lose the sale.<br />
<br />
It's essentially FREE to send an E-mail. It's automated. They continually send marketing E-mails to customers. But they absolutely refuse to inform customers of a critical problem with their account. UNBELIEVABLE. Oh, wait: Maybe this is just <a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2012/07/capital-one-we-dont-care-about-your.html">normal Capital One behavior</a>.Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-12435578827714646752013-06-24T23:46:00.001-07:002013-09-24T00:29:04.896-07:00Yet another streaming lie from NBCSo this time NBC claimed to be streaming the hockey finals. I went to their site to check it out.<br />
<br />
There wasn't even a way to <b>attempt</b> to get the stream. No viewer, no link to "watch now", nothing. Worse yet, the NBC banner at the top indicates that you have to sign up for a free trial. Look at this disgraceful scam:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://i.imgur.com/psfCyLb.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="396" src="http://i.imgur.com/psfCyLb.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
For the "free trial" rip-off, NBC has teamed up with some lowlives called "BombGame." Not surprisingly, your "free" trial will cost you $40 a month after five days. But the best part is that if you attempt to cancel your membership, BombGame threatens to charge you <b>a $1 "convenience fee" TO CANCEL</b>. Look at these scumbags:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://i.imgur.com/IXsjGSu.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="422" src="http://i.imgur.com/IXsjGSu.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
NBC and BombGame: teaming up to lie and rip you off. Why should we be surprised, after the <a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2012/08/nbcs-olympic-lie.html">Olympic streaming sham</a>?Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-47357380169566078522012-11-14T17:16:00.003-08:002013-08-06T01:13:04.108-07:00Time-Warner cable: "We're stupid and we don't have any reasons for it."I got fed up with not being able to access Time-Warner hotspots, which we're supposed to have access to as part of being a Time-Warner cable Internet customer. I wind up dealing with this when there's a hotspot where I happen to be, and it breaks the iPhone's Internet connectivity. The iPhone will automatically connect to an "open" Wi-Fi network, and then sit there stupidly even though you can't get data through it; it's supposed to fall back to cellular, but it doesn't. Longstanding iPhone bug.<br />
<br />
So instead of manually deactivating Wi-Fi all the time, I figured I'd enter my credentials on the TWC log-in page and be done with it. But this page demands that you log in with an E-mail address (<a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2012/06/forcing-people-to-use-e-mail-address-as.html">we all know by now how stupid that is</a>). Even worse is that the E-mail address it wants is the auto-generated one that's associated with your account internally at Time-Warner, in the form of "thomson9063@socal.rr.com". How the hell would I know what that is? And of course there's no way to find out what it is AT THE HOTSPOT, because you inexplicably can't gain access to your account.<br />
<br />
You can't even use the password-reset option, because...<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiv_r_VfgSb4EFHdE6KXmoOFOLn-Q_r_m4P5uMt-K3W5_UD0OwGtfJDcJ4LyO5AbDmtbsQXobODb_Lb-S4Se55KnnqZDto-lwqftPWWI-zMrnS7MHuvFpfvFrKxUDQfB5_uKKltEDVxqv9F/s1600/noCAPTCHA.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="" border="0" height="366" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiv_r_VfgSb4EFHdE6KXmoOFOLn-Q_r_m4P5uMt-K3W5_UD0OwGtfJDcJ4LyO5AbDmtbsQXobODb_Lb-S4Se55KnnqZDto-lwqftPWWI-zMrnS7MHuvFpfvFrKxUDQfB5_uKKltEDVxqv9F/s640/noCAPTCHA.png" title="What CAPTCHA?" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">If only we could follow that instruction.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
And when you come home, you can't use the hotspot help because you're not accessing it through a hotspot. RETARDED. So I tried to contact TWC about this, but their "contact us" link goes to a 404. This is an Internet access provider:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2jP4UPc9Qw9fGg1ATb5W7UTwPvGNObzf6JeaYF-C9YJssR9wljffaBaaEq3poIdKW0NQ0dAdH6AlQBbn1N242l47TgIx55qH9f2d_nFkNVcZ0zVMgXgHNzHkPJNj9-eUqfT20MaNjkeVJ/s1600/8187080852_3c63f0a117_c.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2jP4UPc9Qw9fGg1ATb5W7UTwPvGNObzf6JeaYF-C9YJssR9wljffaBaaEq3poIdKW0NQ0dAdH6AlQBbn1N242l47TgIx55qH9f2d_nFkNVcZ0zVMgXgHNzHkPJNj9-eUqfT20MaNjkeVJ/s640/8187080852_3c63f0a117_c.jpg" width="619" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
So I had to resort to the online chat. Here's the illuminating transcript of my chat with a Time-Warner rep (this was my third chat session after being escalated, after two phone calls and three E-mails and probably an hour and a half).</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: Hello! Thank you for choosing Road Runner Internet Technical Chat Support. My name is Rodney, I will help you.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: How are you doing today?</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: I am a bit tired of dealing with TWC.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: I am sorry to know that.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: We really apologize for the inconvenience.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: Well, let's get it resolved.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: First off, your "contact us" link is broken, and has been broken for some time. How does this go unaddressed?</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: We are aware of it and our engineers are working on it to fix this issue.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: Second, I have repeatedly tried to use TWC wi-fi hotspots, and I m asked for credentials that I had no way of knowing.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: The log-in page demands the auto-generated E-mail address that is associated with my account, but gives you no way to find out what it is.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;"><br /></span></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga-SdqfnoukjkTeAOt5NdxGMtfcbNXe7kaOMFrlKHYObT5Tj2dsoZaL-U7fi3Z7OAZmBj1vSjDLQ51ALjBdRH0XC6egRVPKKRD6i88uqAbV2F1WqPwKOecmVpLH5VsSloQPzyQR6TtoHCV/s1600/TWBullshit.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="435" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga-SdqfnoukjkTeAOt5NdxGMtfcbNXe7kaOMFrlKHYObT5Tj2dsoZaL-U7fi3Z7OAZmBj1vSjDLQ51ALjBdRH0XC6egRVPKKRD6i88uqAbV2F1WqPwKOecmVpLH5VsSloQPzyQR6TtoHCV/s640/TWBullshit.png" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">What you see when you try to use a Time-Warner hotspot.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: I will provide you with the necessary information.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: In order to access TWC Wi-FI you need to use Primary Road Runner email address and the password.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: I have the information now. Not yesterday when I was in a seminar and needed Web access.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: I have never seen this E-mail address before, and I do not use it to access my account. Why on earth do I need to use it at a hotspot?</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: I understand your concern, in order to access TWC Hotspot you need to use Road Runner email address and the passwords. This is for TWC customers only.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: Why can't I use the same credentials I use to access my account at home?</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: Here is the reason: you need to use Primary Email address and the Password to access TWC Hotspots.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: You're simply repeating the problem. WHY? I NEVER use (or even knew) that E-mail address, and yet every month I can log into TWC and pay my bill, change services, and see my personal info.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: I have a log-in ID with Time-Warner cable, and yet I can't use this to log into its hotspots. WHY?</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: We can't use it. We can't use My-Servics account login information to access TWC Hotspots. It won't work. Only Road Runner email address and the password works with TWC Hotspot.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: WHY?</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: We do not have any reasons for it. TWC Hotspots are designed in such a way that, users can only login with there Road Runner email address and the password. It is a default thing. We can't change it.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: But users have no way of knowing WHAT that E-mail address is. It's auto-generated by Time-Warner. The hotspot page gives you no way to find out what it is. This is asinine.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: I will provide you with the Road Runner email address and the password</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: That doesn't help people AFTER THE FACT, now does it? I'm not at the hotspot anymore. I couldn't access it.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: And then when you come home, the TWC hotspot page says you can't access it from home.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: We can only access TWC Hotspots when you are outside the home and near to the TWC Hotspot. We can't access it from home.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Rodney: I will report your feedback to our higher levels and make sure they will look into it.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">ME: OK. Thanks.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
And this was after an even dumber E-mail exchange. Here was my initial support inquiry and TW's follow-up:</div>
<br />
<span style="color: #6aa84f;">Question: I have repeatedly set up a TWC Wi-Fi user ID. It doesn't work.<br /><br />Your online help chat DOESN'T WORK. Your "support" link on the TWCWiFi log-in page goes BACK TO THE LOG-IN PAGE.<br /><br />And if I go home to try to get support from my Time-Warner cable connection, I'm told I can't get support for TWCWiFi through my regular connection. So how am I supposed to use TWC hotspots? I'm tired of this month after month.</span><br />
<span style="color: #6aa84f;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #f1c232;">Thank you for contacting Time Warner Cable, Road Runner email Support.<br /><br />I will assist you with the information.<br />...<br />To login to wifi hot spot, follow the steps:-<br /><br />1. Use your device's wireless connection finder to locate TWCWiFi (SSID) hotspots nearby. Consult our Coverage Map if the TWCWiFi does not appear.<br />2. Connect to TWCWifi and a sign-in page will appear.<br />3. Enter your Road Runner email address and password.<br />4. Agree to the terms of service.<br />5. Click on Sign In.</span><br />
<br />
Yep: When I told Time-Warner I couldn't log into a hotspot, they told me to log into a hotspot.Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-69023389162897311752012-08-03T03:18:00.004-07:002016-08-05T12:38:00.080-07:00NBC's Olympic lieIt's bad enough that the Olympics are spoiled for United States viewers by NBC's abysmal coverage. Unless you choose not to read the news for two weeks, you don't have any reason to watch the Olympics by the time NBC finally gets around to broadcasting them eight or 10 hours late.<br />
<br />
NBC further insults Americans by claiming that they're streaming events live.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV9Jv3RqHTNtqemaWUUA2gkkNHd9UhyDXkPDCHcnkBT3pSFPMcHhNC68Sk2RHeQA9rLj8b8Zsm08UnFfDlUV20UWaqnXXI7X7fevNGh2b2vTW1I6otEH56mFtsDzZMnLADRrAEpVvScMTh/s1600/NBCBullshit01.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="296" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV9Jv3RqHTNtqemaWUUA2gkkNHd9UhyDXkPDCHcnkBT3pSFPMcHhNC68Sk2RHeQA9rLj8b8Zsm08UnFfDlUV20UWaqnXXI7X7fevNGh2b2vTW1I6otEH56mFtsDzZMnLADRrAEpVvScMTh/s400/NBCBullshit01.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
Nope. Take a look at where this lie breaks down.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjg6xQqJ55UQLK4CMybIQEclMEFQNTttBfG4gCeYpT3JvEqa_SRF3R-dlRcirmHG0rYoz2hlDPD5S50Gv7zM4En2do8Y7Qq5JFb05w8UXEed0GQynVR7Fd8bX9aIH9kQGbIASFIIpmqEL1A/s1600/NBCBullshit03.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjg6xQqJ55UQLK4CMybIQEclMEFQNTttBfG4gCeYpT3JvEqa_SRF3R-dlRcirmHG0rYoz2hlDPD5S50Gv7zM4En2do8Y7Qq5JFb05w8UXEed0GQynVR7Fd8bX9aIH9kQGbIASFIIpmqEL1A/s400/NBCBullshit03.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Now why should I log in with some "TV provider's" credentials, when NBC is a publicly viewable network funded by ADVERTISING? Yep, aside from making us wonder what a "form video" is, this screen is a harbinger of bullshit to come. And it comes quickly:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2Lo_BNVUtYbYCF8aYBpoSKSMAHZ0fUGxPXcgtSHu7osYXyeRDHtADloaldhFuONofyrc0G0zXUnT-wqtQb4fU5oiZiO-QBpqWYjHtX2vqG6WwyCSUm5uDOKDZPUgvF-ohBqaGCTkbNxiB/s1600/NBCBullshit02.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="281" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2Lo_BNVUtYbYCF8aYBpoSKSMAHZ0fUGxPXcgtSHu7osYXyeRDHtADloaldhFuONofyrc0G0zXUnT-wqtQb4fU5oiZiO-QBpqWYjHtX2vqG6WwyCSUm5uDOKDZPUgvF-ohBqaGCTkbNxiB/s640/NBCBullshit02.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
So much for Net Neutrality and NBC's fraud. NBC not only rips off American viewers, but it rips off its own sponsors by inexplicably denying them millions of additional viewers. Hell, NBC is ripping off <b>itself</b> by reducing its measurable audience and the value of its content along with it.<br />
<br />
Sponsors should boycott NBC as long as NBC intentionally <b>reduces</b> its audience and insults American viewers with this sham.<br />
<br />
Oh, and as a final stroke of incompetence, that "Learn more/FAQ" link on the initial screen takes you to a video that you can't watch. It goes right back to the "We're Sorry" screen above. What it should say is "We're too stupid to understand our own business model."<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK_roRkggPywJu0hpZk2NE8RsgTZJAKApLlbrE3EiQN4BnepTzJDn83Q2UBjB1vdEV4Yx1MPaFQeYxd1MtLtkGUPSjqJhm4DfQQIig2_o2ycYsIfALRNAz3iIZ3fxHg6C9RQqTY02tkjDv/s1600/21-primary.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK_roRkggPywJu0hpZk2NE8RsgTZJAKApLlbrE3EiQN4BnepTzJDn83Q2UBjB1vdEV4Yx1MPaFQeYxd1MtLtkGUPSjqJhm4DfQQIig2_o2ycYsIfALRNAz3iIZ3fxHg6C9RQqTY02tkjDv/s320/21-primary.jpg" width="239" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Jim Bell, the executive producer of NBC's so-called Olympics coverage, smugly comments to Hollywood Reporter:<br />
<h2 class="main_article_deck" style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: 'Vonness Bold Compressed', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 26px; font-weight: normal; line-height: 30px; margin: 15px 0px; padding: 10px 0px 0px;">
"We can understand and appreciate that people are passionate about things," says Jim Bell. "I think the numbers speak for themselves."</h2>
<div>
Um, no. No they don't. Maybe you can tell us what other options you think viewers had, Mr. Bell. Against what competing Olympics coverage did NBC earn these numbers? We'll be holding our breath for your answer, genius.<br />
<br />
UPDATE: <a href="http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2013/06/yet-another-streaming-lie-from-nbc.html">NBC pulled this same scam again, but even worse.</a><br />
<br />
UPDATE 2016: NBC is ripping off the public and screwing Team USA again.</div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-31936048962542584492012-07-09T15:41:00.002-07:002013-07-29T18:49:04.123-07:00Capital One: We don't care about your security, identity, or business.For the third time in eight months or so, Capital One suddenly started declining my purchases, for the same reason: A merchant's security was compromised and my card number was exposed.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHTYj9AvH59lpVSRQwlIEOG4FhsetdWLcy0NrL20v_elrYJJuMZpXE8FoQUIak9z9kioC4P0vePyTbnBlCWHiXvUQBOLNCi_QWg7zmAFirLmPUcPCUErN9bJwpir3uG_KlLxuOkvsYBnaZ/s1600/CapitalOneDumbShits.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="354" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHTYj9AvH59lpVSRQwlIEOG4FhsetdWLcy0NrL20v_elrYJJuMZpXE8FoQUIak9z9kioC4P0vePyTbnBlCWHiXvUQBOLNCi_QWg7zmAFirLmPUcPCUErN9bJwpir3uG_KlLxuOkvsYBnaZ/s640/CapitalOneDumbShits.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Not once did Capital One even bother to send me an E-mail, let alone call me. They knew my card number was compromised, and that quite possibly other aspects of my identity were open to theft as a result. <b>But they didn't even have their automated system send me an E-mail about this security breach.</b><br />
<br />
It's hard to overstate how irresponsible and offensive this is. But that's not all; Capital One, every time, capped off the offense by proposing to send my replacement card <b>through the regular mail in five to seven days.</b><br />
<br />
A great many people, millions I'm sure, make thousands or tens of thousands of dollars for credit-card companies every year. I make Capital One plenty of money, and yet after I'm inconvenienced <b>and</b> prevented from making them money, they're not going to FedEx my new card. They're going to lazily plop it in the old U.S. mail along with some marketing fliers and maybe some utility payments or magazine cards from people working at the processing center.<br />
<br />
And if you complain about this insult (which you should), you'll still be told that the best they can do is an "expedited" delivery in two to three days. Yes, it's as if they have no idea exactly when this goddamned thing is going to arrive, in 2012. Are they attaching it to a flying burro? A capricious cherub? If you can't figure out how to get a document to a customer in exactly two days, go out of business. NOW.<br />
<br />
And while Capital One is dicking around, I have to wait to go through every service I use and every bill I pay and change the credit card I have on file. And inevitably I'm going to miss one or two and have payments declined.<br />
<br />
Can we continue to hand money to assholes like this and retain any self respect?Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-4847756538865078432012-06-11T11:57:00.006-07:002024-02-20T08:00:43.627-08:00Will Apple ever fix the iPhone's biggest defect?Let's say your iPhone is on its charger in your bedroom. You're taking a shower and somebody calls; you don't hear it. Or you're down the hall doing laundry and somebody calls; you don't hear it. Or the phone is in your purse. Or... you can see where this is going, right?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOocp9wXNX8IIaaLe7vLvFNfFMOGivE91MeCTyVZWCHFS0L2sYYMadgcGR7P7NjNWkn1mBPJ8X_rAUdGSZV-eD5wqBbNafxCZOnfKJkBIaAPIhEVSVxigFvMVvBdekkvGidj7xfrAXzajZ/s1600/iPhoneDocked.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOocp9wXNX8IIaaLe7vLvFNfFMOGivE91MeCTyVZWCHFS0L2sYYMadgcGR7P7NjNWkn1mBPJ8X_rAUdGSZV-eD5wqBbNafxCZOnfKJkBIaAPIhEVSVxigFvMVvBdekkvGidj7xfrAXzajZ/s320/iPhoneDocked.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
You come back and spend a few minutes getting dressed, or putting clothes away. Your iPhone is three feet away, but it sits there silent, not making so much as a chirp to let you know that you missed a call. You might stroll out to the kitchen to make dinner, or whatever... The hours go by, and you never knew that your friend called to see if you wanted to meet up for happy hour.<br />
<br />
The sheer stupidity of this design was inexcusable in version 1 of the iPhone, but here we are <b>20 years later</b> and it still hasn't been fixed. But what did Apple do instead? Add repeating notifications (albeit limited to 10) for TEXT MESSAGES. WTF?<br />
<br />
Dear Apple: When something major happens in my family, my parents aren't going to TEXT me. If someone called me, I want to know about it. <br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifI41ogFgKkRm6TLruLwzXA0p_DWl_wy-hEU-DNPZoqcmVCDa46dQkYujkXSRzFujaitf5PlcTHd7i40kLGuWPnQzSzMhbPK5WVbUErs1ORB8O0bbKwZjaO2dCswpAWeCW6ipBb59ykOMK/s1600/oldSchool.png" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="244" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifI41ogFgKkRm6TLruLwzXA0p_DWl_wy-hEU-DNPZoqcmVCDa46dQkYujkXSRzFujaitf5PlcTHd7i40kLGuWPnQzSzMhbPK5WVbUErs1ORB8O0bbKwZjaO2dCswpAWeCW6ipBb59ykOMK/s640/oldSchool.png" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
The 1990s Motorola StarTAC offered <b>periodic audible notifications of missed calls</b> until you acknowledged them. Microwave ovens beep periodically if you forget to take the food out after cooking it. Old-school answering machines beeped periodically to let you know you had new messages. But Apple's handheld Unix computer/phone sits mute after you've missed a call.<br />
<br />
Do we have to spell this out? A phone should offer the option to periodically notify you with an audible and palpable alert that you've missed a call.<br />
<br />
Baffling:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVOuU5QR4_56hlvzerohDon3xYeA_jzcZ0wudzhXS-xIXbOB8g-akkAft0CmI81qQ4x5xw5s39z6QNa9ork2A28JiigAvzV_GiQW15RGqPpP7VBZ-0kagvL4flQNMMTxwc3cZcljMbOL1F/s1600/notifications.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVOuU5QR4_56hlvzerohDon3xYeA_jzcZ0wudzhXS-xIXbOB8g-akkAft0CmI81qQ4x5xw5s39z6QNa9ork2A28JiigAvzV_GiQW15RGqPpP7VBZ-0kagvL4flQNMMTxwc3cZcljMbOL1F/s640/notifications.png" width="448" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">Pathetic, and </span><span style="color: red; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><b>still not fixed in iOS 16.</b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: red; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com77tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-9808117397597568112012-05-08T22:18:00.001-07:002016-03-30T17:23:08.248-07:00Visual Studio: Is it getting worse as time goes on?I took a hiatus from Windows programming for a few years, working on Macs in the slowly improving but still infuriating Xcode. I harked back to Visual Studio as so much better, a slick IDE that set the standard year after year.<br />
<br />
What a jarring dose of reality when I dove into Visual Studio 2010 a couple years ago. It's plagued by 20-year-old defects that were annoying then but unacceptable and ridiculous now. Microsoft also introduced embarrassing UI regressions that cripple the app in new ways.<br />
<br />
First, the good. The UI's organization is pretty decent, much better than Xcode's:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5027/5580217267_3e8c21d599_z.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5027/5580217267_3e8c21d599_z.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
I started taking notes about the bad. Here they are.<br />
<ul>
<li>The scroll wheel doesn't work in the pane that the cursor is hovering over. You have to click everywhere to activate every pane on the screen. Why should I have to click in the variables pane just to look at a variable?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>A similar focus problem: The drop-down function list retains focus after you select a function, so if you try to scroll your document with the wheel, you're instead scrolling the values inside the (now collapsed) function drop-down.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Massive color problems make text invisible in many parts of the interface.</li>
</ul>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj9oXnqZoenCtYbOl-7ErtVLvYcU0-ulr_6BC5nkmwV4aWN5r9dwESiZS61a5zgD7SgkqMohTXFaEyzcSeFmRu5BOZQLjFcom07_tcBPyqwQqHwsCtCn-dSMRUzL1renrXmoZ3iAJSDmMLx/s1600/projectProperties.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj9oXnqZoenCtYbOl-7ErtVLvYcU0-ulr_6BC5nkmwV4aWN5r9dwESiZS61a5zgD7SgkqMohTXFaEyzcSeFmRu5BOZQLjFcom07_tcBPyqwQqHwsCtCn-dSMRUzL1renrXmoZ3iAJSDmMLx/s640/projectProperties.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<ul>
<li>Project-property dialog is still not resizable, and yet it's full of typically long strings and settings. This retardation plagued Visual C++ two decades ago. Inexcusable.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The drop-down function list still doesn't list all functions in the file; it's limited to the object in which the insertion point is sitting . Or you have to select an object scope from the left drop-down, going through them one at a time, if you don't know which one contains the function you're looking for. Why isn't there an "entire file" scope offered? And why does it continually pick "global scope" by default, when that scope is empty and there's only one scope defined in the file?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Doesn't do syntax completion on symbols. You have to type out every class and variable name, every time.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<ul>
<li>Syntax completion doesn't work if you position the cursor after a period or arrow in member notation and start typing. You have to erase the last character in the symbol and retype it to restart the syntax completion.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>printf statements don't write to the Output window! And the clumsy alternative, OutputDebugString, doesn't take printf-style formatting and insists on wide characters. OutputDebugStringA doesn't require wide characters, but was essentially undocumented; someone in the comments claims it's now documented.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Paths are recorded as absolute, and not relative, when when you navigate to them to set project properties such as the working directory for debugging. So of course the project is broken for anyone trying to use it on a different computer.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If you right-click on a file in the left pane and view its properties, you can't see its path. You have to go two levels deep into the View menu to bring up a whole separate Properties window, which finally shows the path.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Matching braces or parentheses are only highlighted when you first type them, and then never again. They aren't highlighted when the insertion point crosses them.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>There's a "Go to header file" function, but no "Go to implementation file" counterpart. Also, "Go to header" doesn't appear to work if the header's extension is "hpp".</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>There's no way to reveal the file you're editing in Explorer. You can't see the path of the file anywhere either, even if you hunt through the view menu and show the obscure "Properties window". The Properties window goes BLANK if you put the cursor in the editor.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Context menu won't let you search for definitions of symbols in that appear in comments.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Error lines aren't highlighted in code when you double-click an error in the output or error list. Instead, a tiny blue sliver appears in the gutter next to the line, which you have to hunt for. The color settings for "compiler error" are ignored, and you can't set the background color there anyway.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The drop-down function list in the editor will frequently behave as though the function is missing from the source file, and instead jump to the header file; despite the fact that the function IS implemented and compiles just fine.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The option to show line numbers is not in the View menu. It's buried under Tools / Options / Text Editor.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>When you disable a breakpoint, it simply disappears from the left gutter, and to re-enable it you have to pull up the list of all breakpoints and hunt for it.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If you have two vertical tab groups open and select "Close all but this" on one of the tabs in ONE of the groups, it closes the tabs in the other group too.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If you press F12 while debugging, it interrupts the program you're debugging, and there's no way to stop this. F12 is not documented as being mapped anywhere in the VS UI. So if your application uses F12 for something and you need to debug it, you're screwed. (documented: http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/106201/f12-stops-execution-while-debugging-and-sometimes-kills-windows)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The menu option "Stop outlining" only works on the current file, so you have to turn this annoying "feature" off again and again. WTF.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Double-clicking on whitespace to select it doesn't work if the whitespace is only one character (like a tab).</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<br />Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-52595243605545036992012-04-20T18:39:00.006-07:002022-05-29T15:03:19.373-07:00When did the slash become too hard?Hyphens and slashes are not interchangeable. In fact, they're nearly opposite. This fact seems to escape more and more people all the time.<br />
<br />
Why else would we see mistakes like, "It's a win-win situation!"<br />
<br />
What is a "win-win"? Is it anything like a win-celebrating sports fan? Or a game-changing decision? Or an overhead-cam engine? Or a sun-dried tomato? A hyphen takes multiple words and turns them into <b>one descriptive term</b>.<br />
<br />
When you have two sides or two options to a situation, you use a <b>slash</b> to separate them:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
win/lose situation</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
client/server system</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
on/off switch</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
key/value store</div><div style="text-align: center;">work/life balance</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Come on, guys. It's not that hard.</div>Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-67970936590778808272012-04-02T02:38:00.004-07:002012-08-03T03:48:57.215-07:00Girls Around Me: The only victims are the developers<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;">So the new national boogeyman is an application that presents <b>public</b> information. It aggregates FourSquare check-ins by gender and matches them up to <b>public</b> Facebook profiles.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;">But suddenly the people <b>broadcasting</b> their presence at <b>public</b> venues on a <b>public</b> medium are appalled that it might be received by someone. Actually, that's not even true: A bunch of blowhards are appalled <b>on behalf of</b> all these supposed victims, zero of which have come forward to tell about how they suffered any harm from this nightmarish piece of software.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;">Also, if you don't understand what stalking is, stop using the term. Stalking is the pursuit and haranguing of <b>one person at length</b>. Seeing which venues are currently heavily populated with men or women is NOT STALKING. You can't use this application to home in on one person and follow him or her around. But hey, what do the facts matter, when you can put "STALKING APP" in your headline as click bait?</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;">So what are you nefarious users of this app doing? You're finding out where people are to determine WHERE TO GO. Instead of roaming the city and wasting your night on dead venues or the wrong type of crowd, you simply go to the place that has appealing people in it.<br /><br />Yes, that's what people are wailing about. Pretty stupid when you think about it. But really, thinking about it is too much work for most of America today.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;">The United States of today prefers to wallow in pathetic, fake outrage instead of tackling the hard problems. Anybody who even feels "uncomfortable" is a "victim" now. Guess what? The world is full of homeless people, gay people, people who don't believe in your god, deformed people, diseases... and it's not everyone else's job to shield you from them. Deal with it. You have no right to infringe on other people's lives because of your hang-ups.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;">And when you behave like a jagoff and get called out on it, it's not the other person who has the problem. Someone flipped you off for not signaling? Guess what: That's YOUR fault. It's not "road rage". It's someone who has a backbone and isn't going to take your crap.<br /><br />The only victims here are the developers whose time was wasted. And why were these guys targeted, when other apps and sites were doing the same thing a year or more ago? </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: red; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;"><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/where-the-ladies-at/id415602400?mt=8">Here's just one example: Where the Ladies At.</a></span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;">This is the culture of the nanny state. It's one that mollycoddles the irresponsible and the selfish.<span id="goog_1097707961"></span><span id="goog_1097707962"></span><a href="http://www.blogger.com/"></a></span>Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1685771650861274615.post-15611632168278082622012-02-06T14:12:00.000-08:002013-09-03T18:42:43.626-07:00The DouchetagAn InformationWeek article today discussed the derision heaped on Samsung, after Samsung's Super Bowl commercial for the Galaxy tablet depicted someone using a stylus. The Twitter quotes ran like this:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: red; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><i style="font-style: italic;">One of the great things about the #iPhone was abandoning the #stylus. Not sure why #samsung thinks bring it back is #innovation and #freedom</i></span></blockquote>
Yep: the "pound iPhone" and the "pound stylus."<br />
<br />
This guy thinks communication and search technology today is so primitive that every significant term must be specially marked. Why would you even use such a medium, in which you're not free to type messages normally? This is like WordPerfect, circa 1985.<br />
<br />
If you have to litter your communications with asinine codes in the present day, the medium is a failure. Why pander to it?<br />
<br />
One of the #great things about #search #algorithms is how they #rank #significant #words and #devalue #insignificant words, #DUH.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoAbw3CufSVBRe1EOMzA-zaOQW7oF4LQhrqPOdDGXhdkCz09sMZHTp69SzSnV8UNzV2GUt-dNvuXKcpLrqd417M6FLod06689OJNW1EbNu1pJW_vK1OYdccQKulJuJjSi6Mb1FjSv-40_x/s1600/douchorts.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoAbw3CufSVBRe1EOMzA-zaOQW7oF4LQhrqPOdDGXhdkCz09sMZHTp69SzSnV8UNzV2GUt-dNvuXKcpLrqd417M6FLod06689OJNW1EbNu1pJW_vK1OYdccQKulJuJjSi6Mb1FjSv-40_x/s320/douchorts.jpg" width="239" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Pretty sure this guy uses douchetags.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Thankfully, <a href="http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2013/09/03/study-hashtags-are-a-turn-off-on-facebook-reducing-the-viral-reach-of-posts">a recent study showed that the use of douchetags reduces the appeal of content they're embedded in</a>.<br />
<span style="color: red;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: red;">UPDATE</span>: <a href="http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2012/07/20/celeb-boutique-you-freaking-morons">Here's another story about a douchetag user getting rightly reamed across the Internet.</a><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">UPDATE 2</span>: <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gameon/post/2012/09/24/taunting-torrey-smith-tweet/70001046/1#uslPageReturn">There's a pattern emerging here: douchetag users = losers</a><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">UPDATE 3</span>: <a href="http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/10/24/google-wants-everyone-to-know-james-bond-uses-an-android-phone" target="_blank">Google's trying to create its own variation of the douchetag.</a><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">UPDATE 4</span>: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/michelle-shocked-anti-gay-rant-god-hates-fags_n_2901564.html">Michelle Shocked is the latest douchetagger to suffer the consequences</a>.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">UPDATE 5</span>: <a href="http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2013/04/05/microsoft-apologizes-for-employees-xbox-durango-always-online-tweets-claims-customer-centric-approach">Microsoft employee Adam Orth is the latest douchebag douchetagger to get publicly reamed.</a>Oscar Goldmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07994604858833725979noreply@blogger.com7